I honestly can't get over how sharp this lens is

"macanamera" (macanamera) 10/11/2016 at 11:39 • Filed to: None

8

20

hhhnnnnnnngggggg

S65 > macanamera 10/11/2016 at 11:43

0

I was gonna say something stupid about a lawn char or lawnmower but I’m mesmerized by these photos

Daily Drives a Dragon - One Last Lap > macanamera 10/11/2016 at 11:46

0

With that top pic I thought you were talking about the lens on the Jag.

PS9 > macanamera 10/11/2016 at 11:46

1

I honestly can’t get over how you murdered Silvestro and traded his famed pog collection on ebay for an F-Type.

THAT’S RIGHT, I LIED WHEN I SAID I WOULDN’T TELL NO ONE, SILVESTRO WAS MY FRIEND YOU HEARTLESS POG SWAPPER

Leadbull > PS9 10/11/2016 at 11:49

0

Silvestro isn’t real. He was made up by the CIA.

macanamera > PS9 10/11/2016 at 11:50

2

His pogs weren’t worth shit. His kidneys, that’s a different story. Not to mention his gizzard.

macanamera > S65 10/11/2016 at 11:50

0

thanks bae

atrombs > macanamera 10/11/2016 at 11:51

0

I got the 70-300 with VR as a gift about 10 years ago. They really are amazing lenses. That pic of the headlight is amazing.

PS9 > macanamera 10/11/2016 at 11:58

1

OHHHhhhhh that’s how it is. Okay. It’s fine.

Your day is coming, though. Soon. You’re going to take your F-Type to a Cars and Coffee. Yes! You will. All that adoration from fellow gearheads? You won’t be able to resist. Everything will be fine...UNTIL YOU LEAVE BECAUSE THAT’S WHEN I’LL BE THERE WAITING TO STRIKE

random001 > macanamera 10/11/2016 at 11:58

1

That is great! What lens?

macanamera > random001 10/11/2016 at 12:09

0

Nikon 70-200 f/4 G VRIII

macanamera > atrombs 10/11/2016 at 12:16

1

The 70-300 4.5-5.6?

That’s a nice lens, similar to my 18-300 VR. It’s a great street sweeper, you won’t miss anything with it. My only issue is that I’m an absolute stickler for sharpness- that’s why I got this 70-200. I count my pixels.

random001 > macanamera 10/11/2016 at 12:25

0

daaaaaaaamn. That’s nice.

gmctavish needs more space > macanamera 10/11/2016 at 12:42

0

Mmm I believe this would fit on my camera. Do want.

chaozbandit > macanamera 10/11/2016 at 13:13

1

Nice! I’m in a bit of a honeymoon period myself, having recently acquired a Sigma 70-200 f2.8.

Jake - Has Bad Luck So You Don't Have To > macanamera 10/11/2016 at 13:18

0

DAT first pic. I’ll be in my bunk.

TheHondaBro > macanamera 10/11/2016 at 14:14

2

My dad just ordered a 200-500mm lens. I held it in my hands . It felt like the throbbing erection of the great Orion himself.

macanamera > chaozbandit 10/11/2016 at 14:58

0

Yeah! That’s an awesome lens, I just wanted a smaller chunk of glass than all the 2.8s because it’s my primary carry lens. The Nikon 2.8 is also a really heavy breather where the 4 is a true 200 at all lengths- I use this lens for macro so that was a big selling point for me.

macanamera > gmctavish needs more space 10/11/2016 at 14:59

0

It’ll fit any Nikon SLR from the last 10+ years. There’s def better all around lenses though.

gmctavish needs more space > macanamera 10/11/2016 at 16:31

0

Perfect. I have the basic 18-55 and my dad has a telephoto that I can’t remember the specs of for his, but I’ve been wanting to get some better lens action for mine when money is less tight

chaozbandit > macanamera 10/11/2016 at 16:47

0

Nice! Look forward to seeing more of your shots.

I mainly spend my weekends shooting cars and such, so having to lug around 1kg in gear is something I have yet to adjust to. Definitely a step up from my usual Zeiss 16-70f4, though I figured the 2.8 would be useful for events that go into the night.